Meet the Co-chairs - TAGLAW
Nysingh advocaten-notarissen N.V.
Meet the Co-chairs - TAG-SP
Scopelitis, Garvin, Light, Hanson & Feary, P.C.
Transportation and Logistics
Author: Rishin Patel
THE 2018 ROAD TO ZERO STRATEGY CONFIRMED THAT ALL VEHICLES SOLD IN THE UK BY 2040 MUST PRODUCE ZERO CARBON EMISSIONS; A DECISION WHICH AIMS TO ENABLE THE UK TO MEET A BROADER COMMITMENT TO HAVE NET ZERO CARBON EMISSIONS BY 2050. THE ELECTRIC VEHICLE SMART CHARGING CONSULTATION RELEASED IN JULY 2019 AIMS TO INTRODUCE THE REGULATORY CHANGES NEEDED FOR AN ELECTRIC NETWORK THAT SERVICES THIS FUTURE DEMAND CREATED BY ELECTRIC VEHICLES.
On June 25, 2019, Governor J.B. Pritzker signed into law the Illinois Cannabis Regulation and Tax Act (Cannabis Act), effective January 1, 2020, making Illinois the 33rd state (including D.C.) to legalize marijuana for recreational or medicinal use. Illinois’ action demonstrates a growing trend to legalize some form of marijuana use and certainly highlights the growing conflict between federal and state laws. The trend particularly impacts employers, who are left to determine the extent to which they can continue to test for marijuana use and discipline employees for a positive test.
TAG-SP partner Firm Scopelitis, Garvin, Light, Hanson & Feary recently published an Expert Analysis piece on FMCSA’s recently published proposed rulemaking on hours of service, or HOS, for truck drivers.
The Scopelitis International Transportation & Logistics Law team has created this monthly newsletter highlighting the latest developments in international transportation. This month's contents include:
On Friday, May 3, 2019, the Central District of California entered an order dismissing the meal and rest break claims of the plaintiff and absent class based on the December 28, 2018 decision from the FMCSA preempting the California meal and rest break rules as they apply to interstate drivers. See Ayala v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. et al., Case No. EDCV 16-137-GW(KKx). Despite the plaintiff’s challenges to the FMCSA’s decision, the district court reasoned that it lacked authority to make any determination regarding the merits of the FMCSA’s decision. It could only enforce it.